None

PUZZLE OF THE WEEK

The first 2n positive integers are arbitrarily divided into two groups of n numbers each.  The numbers in the first group are sorted in ascending order:a1 < a2 < ... < an; the numbers in the second group are sorted in descending order: b1 > b2 > ... > bn.

Find, with proof, the value of the sum |a1 − b1| + |a2 − b2| + ... + |an − bn|.

Archive    Comment    Get in email

QUESTION OF THE DAY

My bag can carry no more than ten books. I must carry at least one book each of management, mathematics, physics and fiction. Also for every management book I carry I must carry two or more fiction books, and for every mathematics book I carry I must carry two or more physics books. I earn 4, 3, 2 and 1 points for each management, mathematics, physics and fiction book, respectively, I carry in my bag. I want to maximize the points I can earn by carrying the most appropriate combination of books in my bag. The maximum points that I can earn are:

Options

  1. (1) 20

  2. (2) 21

  3. (3) 22

  4. (4) 23

Archive    Comment    Get in email

CURRENT POLL

What is more to blame for the deteriorating law and order situation in India?




TODAY`S WORDLIST

Archive    Get in email

 

RC QUESTION OF THE DAY

Then there is another very curious form of moral argument, which is this: they say that the existence of God is required to bring justice into the world. In the part of the universe that we know there is a great injustice, and often the good suffer, and the often the wicked prosper, and one hardly knows which of those is more annoying; but if you are going to have justice in the universe as a whole you have to suppose a future life to redress the balance of life here on earth. So they say that there must be a God, and that there must be Heaven and Hell in order that in the long run there may be justice. That is a very curious argument. If you looked at the matter from a scientific point of view, you would say, "After all, I only know this world. I do not know about the rest of the universe, but so far as one can argue from probabilities one would say that probably this world is a fair sample, and if there is injustice here then the odds are great that there is injustice elsewhere also." Supposing you got a crate of oranges that you opened, and you found all the top layer of oranges bad, you would not argue, "The underneath ones must be good, so as to redress the balance." You would say, "Probably the whole lot is a bad consignment"; and that is really what a scientific person would argue about the universe. He would say, "Here we find in this world a great deal of injustice, and so far as that goes that is a reason for supposing that justice does not rule in this world, and therefore so far as it goes it supports a moral argument against deity and not in favor of one." Of course I know that the sort of intellectual arguments that I have been talking to you about is not really what moves people. What really moves people to believe in God is not any intellectual argument at all. Most people believe in God because they have been taught from early infancy to do it, and that is the main reason.

Then I think that the next most powerful reason is the wish for safety, a sort of feeling that there is a big brother who will look after you. That plays a very profound part in influencing people's desire for a belief in God.

 

1.Q. Which of the following statements does the author most likely to agree?

Options

  1. (1) The existence of God is required to bring justice into the world.

  2. (2) Often the good suffer, and often the wicked prosper.

  3. (3) One has to suppose a future life to redress the balance of life here on earth.

  4. (4) Most people believe in God just because they are told to believe in God.

 

2.Q. While presenting his ideas in the passage, the author has followed all of the following approaches EXCEPT

Options

(1) Giving a contrast between two schools of thought.

(2) Giving an example to prove a point.

(3) Criticizing the moral point of view of existence of God.

(4) Explaining reasons for the existence of God.

 

3.Q. The author uses the example of crate of oranges in the passage to

Options

(1) Counter the moral argument of existence of hell & heaven.

(2) Deny the existence of God.

(3) Recant the possibility of future life to redress the balance of life here on earth.

(4) Show a scientific perspective for not believing in the concept of hell & heaven.

Archive    Comment    Get in email

PRO-C Education - Complete MBA/MCA/GRE/GMAT/GATE/Banking Prep Site

Copy Right @ PRO-C Education Pvt Ltd 2009-10

Demo Courseware   |   Take Free Tests  |  Media Kit  |   Buy E& Correspondance Courses   Success Stories  Webmail